|
SA POLL- PUBLIC SCHOOLS DO WELL
WITH VALUES EDUCATION
The
Australian School of Government Studies recently polled a random
sample of 400 South Australians about their views on the teaching
and practice of values in South Australia public schools. The
results were very positive with more than 39% agreeing that state
schools teach values such as doing your best, being responsible,
care and compassion. A further 16% said maybe. Nearly 32% disagreed.
The
telephone poll, conducted over the week ending 29th March, asked one
simple question, a polling technique which gets a more
representative response than long interviews which many people find
intrusive.
Question: “ Do you believe that state
schools teach values such as doing your best, being responsible,
care and compassion?”
The respondents were asked to indicate Yes
- No - Maybe - Don’t Know - No comment
The Responses
Yes - 39% No - 32% Maybe - 16% Don’t Know - 12% No Comment - 1.5%
Since parents of private schools were also
represented proportionately in the sample, the results are a
significant pat on the back to the state system, teachers and
parents. Of even more interest is the percentage of respondents who
have firm views about the issue.
Photograph courtesy Modbury School SA.
Top
VALUES-PRACTISING WHAT WE
PREACH
A Test Case As part of its Values Alive
and Well! programme, ACSSO and Australian Parents Council ran a
workshop and active focus group at the 2006 Values Education
National Forum. An active focus group is a technique which tests a
proposition through an exercise designed to test people’s reactions
then draw conclusions from their behaviour.
The
workshop/focus group was run by ACSSO President Jennifer Branch,
ACSSO Executive Officer Hon.Terry Aulich and APC Executive Director
Ian Dalton.
The
proposition to be tested was simple; that the values we hold need to
be practised in a real world that is not always perfect and that
treating people with respect actually leads to better outcomes in
the workplace, especially schools.
We
divided the focus group into two groups and provided them with a
scenario which was based on a clash of values of the kind that can
face school principals and school communities. Details of the
scenario follow, and can be used by any group for their own training
and awareness raising purposes.
Unknown to the other participants, two real life principals
were asked to play roles. One was to be inclusive, understanding,
respectful of the parent representatives whilst the other was to be
pushy, single minded and determined to get her own way. The three
facilitators then attempted to ensure that, within the two groups,
there was a potential clash of values wherever possible.
The Results The group with the inclusive
principal actually achieved more and their strategy was far more
effective than the other group which had been driven in directions
overtly dominated by the principal. For example, the inclusive group
actually produced a well balanced media statement and had a
reasonable compromise in place when the two groups joined up again.
The second group couldn’t actually agree on what they had decided or
even what had gone on in the negotiations. They had no press release
and were already wary of what the principal might do with the
media.
Top
RESOLVING A CLASH OF VALUES IN A SCHOOL
SITUATION
The
following scenario was used in a workshop at the Values Education
National Forum held at the National Museum in Canberra on 4 nad 5
May 2006. Readers are welcome to use this in their own
schools.
Suggested Format Ten minute introduction
and scene setting Twenty minute School Board meeting Fifteen
minute report back from the three Board meetings Fifteen minutes
plenary analysis
Scenario Your school, Northfield High,
is a large high school of 1000 students in the inner suburbs of
Melbourne It is quite multicultural given that there are 25
nationalities and many religions represented in the student
population. A number are recent immigrants from the Middle East,
such as Iraqis and Iranians and many from Indo-China. The school
board has already selected and applied for major capital funding
under the Australian Government’s Investing in Our Schools
Programme. The deadline has closed for 2006. The project is the
building of a badly needed covered structure which, in the
overcrowded school grounds, will provide a sealed lunching and
meeting area. The school and parents are delighted with the
proposal, without understanding all the planning issues like siting,
sewerage connections etc The Victorian Education Department has
previously advised the school that the structure can only be built
in that position. The trouble now begins. The project will
pave most of the memorial gardens which were planted to commemorate
two former students of the school who were killed in the first Gulf
War and in Vietnam respectively. The garden has a lone pine tree now
40 years old commemorating the Vietnam veteran and a 15 year rose
garden which commemorates the Gulf War soldier who died. There
has been a belated protest from the state RSL which has made last
night’s television news. Some of the more recent immigrants are
strongly in favour of the new project because it will allow a de
facto separation of boys and girls during the school breaks. One of
the parents on the School Board has already made a statement to that
effect and others also see it as a matter of principle.
You
are the School Board and you are about to meet to make a decision
and issue a statement to the parent-school community and to the
waiting press who see a good front page story.
How
will you handle the issue and possible future issues like it? How
will the process that you follow relate to the nine Values for
Australian Schooling ?
Action Play the role of the Board,
prepare the agreed statement and report. Appoint a minute
secretary to the Board who records the discussion and the agreed
final statement.
Top |